THE DAILY WHIP: THURSDAY, OCTOBER 12, 2017
HOUSE MEETS AT: | FIRST VOTE PREDICTED: | LAST VOTE PREDICTED: |
---|---|---|
10:00 a.m.: Morning Hour 12:00 p.m.: Legislative Business Fifteen “One Minutes” | 3:30 – 4:00 p.m. | 4:00 – 4:30 p.m. |
Complete Consideration ofS. 585 – Dr. Chris Kirkpatrick Whistleblower Protection Act of 2017 (Sen. Johnson – Oversight and Government Reform)(One Hour of debate). This bill seeks to strengthen protections for lower-level federal whistleblowers. It requires agency heads to propose suspensions of at least three to five days for first offenses and termination for second offenses if an agency head, administrative law judge, Merit Systems Protection Board, a federal judge, or Inspector General finds that supervisors retaliated against whistleblowers. The bill also reduces the length of notice requirement for proposed disciplinary action for thirty to fourteen days, and eliminates the option to hold hearings if supervisors contest a proposed disciplinary action. The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has expressed concern that this and other provisions may not withstand constitutional scrutiny if challenged in court. In Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, the Court ruled that agencies must notify employees of factors they will consider regarding the penalties and provide employees with meaningful opportunities to respond, in order to comply with Due Process protections.
While it is essential to provide funding to address these emergency issues, House Republicans failed to include funding for the Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands Medicaid programs. It is essential that Republicans include funding for these services in the next round of emergency assistance which is expected in the coming weeks. Motion to Go to Conference on H.R. 2810 – National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018, and Democratic Motion to Instruct Conferees | ||
THE DAILY QUOTE |
---|
“President Trump is due to sign an executive order Thursday morning intended to allow individuals and small businesses to buy a long-disputed type of health insurance that skirts state regulations… Critics, who include state insurance commissioners, most of the health-insurance industry and mainstream policy specialists, predict that a proliferation of such health plans will have damaging ripple effects: driving up costs for consumers with serious medical conditions and prompting more insurers to flee the law’s marketplaces.” - Washington Post, 10/12/2017 |